I’ve had a chance to read through the 2000 state trails master plan with a fine tooth comb and found it very interesting reading. One thing that I noted is that trails are pushed from the smaller volunteer groups resulting in a bottom up approach. It looks like a lot of work went into the plan, which included a lot of meetings with community groups and stakeholders.
The bottom up approach has been recognised as not the best way to go forward with trail planning. It has been widely noticed that small groups have no choice but to take it upon themselves which is unfair.
DSR with funding from lottery west has played a role in trails development, which was meant to be a short-term solution until a more permanent one is found. Which has not happened yet.
I noticed at the last state trails conference a govt state trails body to work with a top down method has been suggested and is on the cards and by the sounds of it has been for a while. Are we any closer for such a body to actually happen?
The trails master plan 2000, which was initiated 3 years earlier, has not been implemented and is now out of date. I have noticed some criticism thrown its way not surprising after 13 years. It comes across as bit of a waste of resources. Are there plans for another trails master plan?
Also is there a copy copy of the 2000 master plan that can be downloaded?
NOTE: I’m looking at the document from the view point of mountain biking, which has a huge increase in participation over the last 10 years.
Open for discussion.
Tags: 2000, Trails, master, plan
-
▶ Reply to This